Understanding occupant behaviour in Islamic homes to close the gap in building performance simulation: A case study of houses in Riyadh

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores the influence of Saudi Arabian culture on the use of energy in domestic buildings. Building occupation/load schedules are used to simulate and predict energy-using activities. However, the effective use of this method depends on accurate load schedules. Failure to achieve this can result in a mismatch between predicted and actual energy use of up to 40%. Cultural and behavioural factors have a significant impact on the assumptions incorporated within the load schedules and it is, therefore, important to look at these features in detail. Using a time use data (TUD) survey, it is possible to improve the accuracy of this information, which can reduce the mismatch to 15%.

References Powered by Scopus

The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation

874Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introducing the prebound effect: The gap between performance and actual energy consumption

502Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A high-resolution domestic building occupancy model for energy demand simulations

485Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A conceptual examination about the correlates of psychological capital (PsyCap) among the Saudi Arabian workforce

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aljammaz, M., Wang, T. H., & Peng, C. (2019). Understanding occupant behaviour in Islamic homes to close the gap in building performance simulation: A case study of houses in Riyadh. In Building Simulation Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 2107–2114). International Building Performance Simulation Association. https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2019.210185

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 1

50%

Engineering 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0