Polymorphisms of genes in the lipid metabolism pathway and risk of biliary tract cancers and stones: A population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China

35Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Biliary tract cancers, encompassing the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile duct, and ampulla of Vater, are uncommon yet highly fatal malignancies. Gallstones, the primary risk factor for biliary cancers, are linked with hyperlipidemia. We examined the associations of 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms of five genes in the lipid metabolism pathway with the risks of biliary cancers and stones in a population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China. We included 235 gallbladder, 125 extrahepatic bile duct, and 46 ampulla of Vater cancer cases, 880 biliary stone cases, and 779 population controls. Subjects completed an in-person interview and gave blood. Genotyping was conducted by Taq-Man assay using DNA from buffy coats. The effects of APOE IVS1+69 (rs440446) and APOB IVS6+360C>T (rs520354) markers were limited to men. Men carrying the G allele of APOE IVS1+69 had a 1.7-fold risk of stones [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.2-2.4], a 1.8-fold risk of gallbladder cancer (95% CI, 1.0-3.3), a 3.7-fold risk of bile duct cancer (95% CI, 2.0-7.0), and a 4-fold risk of ampullary cancer (95% CI, 1.4-12.4). Male carriers of the T allele of APOB IVS6+360C T (rs1003723) had a 1.5-fold risk of bile duct cancer. Our findings suggest that gene variants in the lipid metabolism pathway contribute to the risk of biliary tract stones and cancers, particularly of the bile duct. Copyright © 2008 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andreotti, G., Chen, J., Gao, Y. T., Rashid, A., Chen, B. E., Rosenberg, P., … Hsing, A. W. (2008). Polymorphisms of genes in the lipid metabolism pathway and risk of biliary tract cancers and stones: A population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 17(3), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free