Clinical outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and BA.1/BA.1.1 or BA.2 subvariant infection in Southern California

232Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Epidemiologic surveillance has revealed decoupling of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations and deaths from case counts after emergence of the Omicron (B.1.1.529) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant globally. However, assessment of the relative severity of Omicron variant infections presents challenges because of differential acquired immune protection against Omicron and prior variants and because longer-term changes have occurred in testing and healthcare practices. Here we show that Omicron variant infections were associated with substantially reduced risk of progression to severe clinical outcomes relative to time-matched Delta (B.1.617.2) variant infections within a large, integrated healthcare system in Southern California. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for any hospital admission, symptomatic hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and death comparing individuals with Omicron versus Delta variant infection were 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.69), 0.59 (0.51–0.68), 0.50 (0.29–0.87), 0.36 (0.18–0.72) and 0.21 (0.10–0.44), respectively. This reduced severity could not be explained by differential history of prior infection among individuals with Omicron or Delta variant infection and was starkest among individuals not previously vaccinated against COVID-19 (aHR = 0.40 (0.33–0.49) for any hospital admission and 0.14 (0.07–0.28) for death). Infections with the Omicron BA.2 subvariant were not associated with differential risk of severe outcomes in comparison to BA.1/BA.1.1 subvariant infections. Lower risk of severe clinical outcomes among individuals with Omicron variant infection should inform public health response amid establishment of the Omicron variant as the dominant SARS-CoV-2 lineage globally.

References Powered by Scopus

Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection

9012Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple Imputation after 18+ Years

2899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England

1698Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: immune escape, transmission and fitness

772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants BA.1 to BA.5: Implications for immune escape and transmission

334Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SARS-CoV-2 variant evasion of monoclonal antibodies based on in vitro studies

192Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewnard, J. A., Hong, V. X., Patel, M. M., Kahn, R., Lipsitch, M., & Tartof, S. Y. (2022). Clinical outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and BA.1/BA.1.1 or BA.2 subvariant infection in Southern California. Nature Medicine, 28(9), 1933–1943. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01887-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

55%

Researcher 10

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

60%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

19%

Immunology and Microbiology 5

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 7
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 644

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free