The Relationship Between Human Nature and Human Rights. The Confucian Example

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, the author wants to address the problem of consequences of the classical Confucian view of human nature and possible arguments, conclusions, and assumptions concerning rights within Confucianism that are pre-established and grounded in “nature”. The author’s aim is to analyze the impact of the particular vision of human nature developed by Mengzi on the “discursive space of Confucianism” and to analyze the elements of Mencian theory that determine the lack (or weakness) of recognition of rights and even the existence of the discourse on rights within Confucian philosophical tradition. A working thesis is that a well-established Confucian (Mencian) concept of inborn goodness (i.e., four, hard-wired emotional “sprouts” and a capacity to develop them) that, in many ways, preceded scientific discoveries, was rather an obstacle to developing sensitivity for human rights in the Middle Kingdom and not its stimulus. The Confucian example provides a starting point for preliminary statements concerning the status of and justification for human rights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stępień, M. (2014). The Relationship Between Human Nature and Human Rights. The Confucian Example. In Ius Gentium (Vol. 35, pp. 79–93). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8672-0_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free