Reasons for becoming a postdoc: Differences by race and foreign-born status

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background/Context: The postdoctorate has become an important component of research careers in a growing number of science and engineering (S&E) fields. However, a tight academic job market, the growing number of postdocs, and the heightened internationalization of the position in the United States call the traditional definition of the position into question. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: Doctorate recipients who aspire to research careers may be forced to remain postdocs while waiting for their desired permanent position to become available. We hypothesize that foreign-born doctoral recipients, particularly those who are female and/or non-White, are more likely than their U.S.-born, male, or White counterparts to become a postdoc for reasons not related to professional training and development. Research Design: To explore these hypotheses, we have analyzed individual-level data from the 2006 administration of the U.S. National Science Foundation's Survey of Doctorate Recipients using multinomial logistic regression. Findings/Results: We find that the reasons for working as a postdoc differ by race, foreign-born status, and the interaction of these two factors. In particular, foreign-born Asians are much more likely than their White U.S. counterparts to accept a postdoc job because no other options are available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y., & Cantwell, B. (2016). Reasons for becoming a postdoc: Differences by race and foreign-born status. Teachers College Record, 118(11), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611801106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free