(from the introduction) This book provides a clear and concise outline of the clinical methods employed in the assessment of criminal responsibility. These clinical methods are framed by insanity standards and relevant case law. To achieve its goals, the book is organized into 2 major parts. Part I provides a conceptual basis for understanding (1) the insanity defense and the responsibilities of involved professionals, and (2) commonly encountered clinical issues (e.g., malingering and amnesia) that greatly complicate insanity evaluations. Part II examines (1) the use of interviews, testing, and specialized procedures in insanity evaluations, and (2) discusses the integration and presentation of data to the courts. Parts I and II provide mental health professionals with a theoretical and practical framework for conducting insanity evaluations. Similarly, they provide attorneys with a foundation for evaluating the quality of insanity evaluations and challenging substandard assessments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved) (introduction)
CITATION STYLE
Diner, B. C. (2002). Conducting Insanity Evaluations, 2nd ed. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(2), 170–171. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v63n0214b
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.