An analysis of the productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder irrigation in Ethiopia

20Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Agriculture is the mainstay of Ethiopia’s economy, contributing more than 40% to GDP and providing a livelihood to about 80% of the population. Agriculture is dominated by smallholders growing predominantly rainfed cereals, making economic performance dependent on rainfall availability. This study used the stochastic frontier production function to analyse the productivity and technical efficiency of 4 different agricultural production systems in Ethiopia; namely, irrigated seasonal farms on traditional irrigation systems, irrigated seasonal farms on modern communal irrigation systems, rainfed seasonal farms for farmers who have access to irrigation and rainfed seasonal farms for farmers who do not have access to irrigation. Simple random samples of farmers were selected from lists of farmers. The sample of farmers constituted 122 from the traditional irrigated sites, 281 from the modern communal irrigated sites and 350 from the control rainfed sites of farmers without access to irrigation. For those farmers, from both traditional and modern communal irrigation, who also had access to rainfed farms, their rainfed farms were included in the sample of rainfed with access to irrigation. This sample constituted 434 farmers. The marginal productivity of land on modern communal irrigation systems shows that this is the smallholder irrigation option that should be developed by the Government of Ethiopia. However, the marginal productivity of land in the ‘rainfed without access to irrigation’ category is higher than that of the traditional irrigated system. Thus additional developed land should be put under ‘rainfed without access to irrigation’ before it is put under traditional irrigation; otherwise it should be developed into modern communal irrigation. The average technical efficiency for the modern irrigated system was estimated to be about 71%, whereas this was estimated to be 78% for the ‘rainfed without access to irrigation’ system. There are potential gains to be realised in improving efficiency in these two systems.

References Powered by Scopus

Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models

6217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data

3666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model

2118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Irrigation infrastructure and farm productivity in the Philippines: A stochastic Meta-Frontier analysis

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implications of adopting drip irrigation system on crop yield and gender-sensitive issues: The case of Haramaya district, Ethiopia

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of technical efficiency of smallholder tomato producers in Asaita district, Afar National Regional State, Ethiopia

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Makombe, G., Namara, R. E., Awulachew, S. B., Hagos, F., Ayana, M., & Kanjere, M. (2017). An analysis of the productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder irrigation in Ethiopia. Water SA, 43(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v43i1.08

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

62%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

26%

Researcher 4

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23

46%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12

24%

Environmental Science 8

16%

Social Sciences 7

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free