Correcting scientific knowledge in a general-purpose ontology

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

General-purpose ontologies (e.g. WordNet) are convenient, but they are not always scientifically valid. We draw on techniques from semantic class learning to improve the scientific validity of WordNet's physics forces hyponym (IS-A) hierarchy for use in an intelligent tutoring system. We demonstrate the promise of a web-based approach which gathers web statistics used to relabel the forces as scientifically valid or scientifically invalid. Our results greatly improve the F1 for predicting scientific invalidity, with small improvements in F1 for predicting scientific validity and in overall accuracy compared to the WordNet baseline. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lipschultz, M., & Litman, D. (2010). Correcting scientific knowledge in a general-purpose ontology. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6095 LNCS, pp. 374–376). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_75

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free