Threshold determination and engaging materials scientists in ontology design

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper reports on research exploring a threshold for engaging scientists in semantic ontology development. The domain application, nanocrystalline metals, was pursued using a multi-method approach involving algorithm comparison, semantic concept/term evaluation, and term sorting. Algorithms from four open source term extraction applications (RAKE, Tagger, Kea, and Maui) were applied to a test corpus of preprint abstracts from the arXiv repository. Materials scientists identified 92 terms for ontology inclusion from a combined set of 228 unique terms, and the term sorting activity resulted in 9 top nodes. The combined methods were successful in engaging domain scientists in ontology design, and give a threshold capacity measure (threshold acceptability) to aid future work. This paper presents the research background and motivation, reviews the methods and procedures, and summarizes the initial results. A discussion explores term sorting approaches and mechanisms for determining thresholds for engaging scientist in semantically-driven ontology design and the concept of ontological empowerment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greenberg, J., Zhang, Y., Ogletree, A., Tucker, G. J., & Foley, D. (2015). Threshold determination and engaging materials scientists in ontology design. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 544, pp. 39–50). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24129-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free