Gynaecological laparoscopy: Clinical experiences of two anaesthetic techniques

27Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two anaesthetic techniques were assessed in 120 fit young women having non-emergency gynaecologial laparoscopy as in-patients. One group breathed halothane spontaneously via a face mask, and the second group were given neuromuscular blocking drugs and ventilation was controlled. There was no significant difference in intraoperative anaesthetic or surgical complications between the two groups although morbidity was greater in the intubated group when assessed 4h after surgery. After 24h there was no difference in postoperative morbidity. In an appendix to the study, 40 day-stay patients having the same operation under similar conditions were reviewed. After 24 h abdominal pain, lethargy and weakness were still present; 30% of the patients stated that they would prefer to be admitted overnight for a similar procedure in the future. © 1984 The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurer, F. L., & Welch, D. B. (1984). Gynaecological laparoscopy: Clinical experiences of two anaesthetic techniques. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 56(11), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/56.11.1207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free