Comparative study of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer: Our institutional experience

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. Materials and Methods: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution. The safety and morbidity of the two groups were compared based on mean operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complication, etc., and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 20. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared between two groups with Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test for data analysis. The survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic staging, 45 underwent laparotomy, and 13 cases lap converted to open surgery. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic procedure was lower than the open procedure (P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay of patients who underwent laparoscopic staging was around 7.1 days significantly less compared to the laparotomy group. Intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that of the laparotomy group (P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in nodal retrieval between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P = 0.172). The mean duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly greater in the laparotomy group than the laparoscopic group (13 and 7 days, P < 0.001). Based on the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, there was no difference in survival rates between the groups. Median follow-up duration was 32 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgical staging is oncologically safe for the management of endometrial cancer with acceptable morbidity compared to the open approach with far less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay.

References Powered by Scopus

Endometrial cancer

1315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2

1075Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer - A prospective randomized trial

259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Review of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: Extraperitoneal Approach May Have the Advantage over Intraperitoneal Approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treatment of endometrial cancer from 2000 to 2020 in Germany: a retrospective population based cohort study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Desmoid tumor mimicking port site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shanmugam, S., Thanikachalam, R., & Murugan, A. (2020). Comparative study of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer: Our institutional experience. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 9(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

57%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free