Recent developments in Bayesian experimental pragmatics have received much attention. The Rational Speech Act (RSA) model formalizes core concepts of traditional pragmatic theories quantitatively and makes predictions that fit empirical data nicely. In this paper, we analyze the RSA model and its relation to closely related game theoretic approaches, by spelling out its belief, goal and action components. We introduce some alternatives motivated from the game theoretic tradition and compare models incorporating these alternatives systematically to the original RSA model, using Bayesian model comparison, in terms of their ability to predict relevant empirical data. The result suggests that the RSA model could be adapted and extended to improve its predictive power, in particular by taking speaker preferences into account.
CITATION STYLE
Qing, C., & Franke, M. (2015). Variations on a Bayesian Theme: Comparing Bayesian Models of Referential Reasoning. In Language, Cognition, and Mind (Vol. 2, pp. 201–220). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17064-0_9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.