Expertise in Methods, Methods of Expertise

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Scientific expertise is a key issue in the concept of the knowledge society. While the focus of much of the current research is on the user- or the demand-side of scientific expertise, the focus of this paper is on its formation. To achieve this, it aims at establishing a connection of the history of scientific methods with the history of scientific expertise. In my view, competence in methods is the basis for the building of capabilities that are needed to help in the solution of others’ problems. Furthermore, because competence in methods is not an easily accessible – but often even an exclusive – qualification, it contributes to the demarcation of expert and layperson. Though historical in perspective and methodology, this paper involves epistemological and sociological issues as well. The first part deals with the topic of methods in the history of science, illustrating it with the example of the impact of physical methods on chemistry in the second half of the twentieth century. The second part tackles the notion of scientific expertise, exemplified with a case study on analytical chemistry in mid-nineteenth century.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reinhardt, C. (2011). Expertise in Methods, Methods of Expertise. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 274, pp. 143–159). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free