A case for seaweed aquaculture inclusion in U.S. nutrient pollution management

27Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Seaweed aquaculture is capable of removing large quantities of nitrogen and phosphorus from coastal ecosystems, yet seaweed has gained little traction for its potential role in targeted nutrient assimilation. Marine nutrient pollution is increasing around the world, contributing to expanding eutrophic conditions and co-occurring with other stressors that impact the state and stability of aquatic ecosystems. In the United States, climate change, legacy nitrogen, and nonpoint source pollution make it increasingly difficult to curb growing eutrophication and the associated effects, such as hypoxia (dissolved oxygen < 2 mgL-1). Employing a synthetic semi-quantitative approach, we use the Gulf of Mexico as a case study – a U.S. priority area for aquaculture with substantial nutrient pollution and one of the largest hypoxic zones on the planet – to assess the potential for native seaweed aquaculture to augment upstream pollution control with downstream nutrient assimilation. Results from this analysis suggest that given growing market demand, new product pathways, and nutrient pollution markets, seaweed aquaculture may be a feasible tool for nutrient assimilation that could subsidize, if not pay for itself.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Racine, P., Marley, A. C., Froehlich, H. E., Gaines, S. D., Ladner, I., MacAdam-Somer, I., & Bradley, D. (2021). A case for seaweed aquaculture inclusion in U.S. nutrient pollution management. Marine Policy, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104506

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free