Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention

126Citations
Citations of this article
218Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In complex scenes, the identity of an auditory object can build up across seconds. Given that attention operates on perceptual objects, this perceptual buildup may alter the efficacy of selective auditory attention over time. Here, we measured identification of a sequence of spoken target digits presented with distracter digits from other directions to investigate the dynamics of selective attention. Performance was better when the target location was fixed rather than changing between digits, even when listeners were cued as much as 1 s in advance about the position of each subsequent digit. Spatial continuity not only avoided well known costs associated with switching the focus of spatial attention, but also produced refinements in the spatial selectivity of attention across time. Continuity of target voice further enhanced this buildup of selective attention. Results suggest that when attention is sustained on one auditory object within a complex scene, attentional selectivity improves over time. Similar effects may come into play when attention is sustained on an object in a complex visual scene, especially in cases where visual object formation requires sustained attention. © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA.

References Powered by Scopus

6521Citations
3128Readers
Get full text
1632Citations
912Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

408Citations
476Readers
Get full text
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Best, V., Ozmeral, E. J., Kopčo, N., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(35), 13174–13178. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803718105

Readers over time

‘08‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 91

53%

Researcher 54

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 23

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 64

48%

Engineering 24

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24

18%

Neuroscience 21

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0