Isn't the efficacy of antidepressants clinically relevant? A critical comment on the results of the metaanalysis by Kirsch et al. 2008

50Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The metaanalysis of Kirsch (PLoS Med 5:e45, 2008) has (unfortunately!) attracted too much attention in the specialized press and especially in the lay press. Therefore, intensive critical commenting is necessary to not further alarm experts and health authorities as well as patients and family members. The specified commenting on these metaanalyses shall be prefaced with a short and critical commentary regarding the general significance of metaanalyses. The results of metaanalyses should not too naively be interpreted as the 'truth' as regards to the evidence based psychopharmacotherapy, but should be qualified in their significance due to principal methodological reasons Maier (Nervenarzt 78:1028-1036, 2007; Möller (Nervenarzt 78:1014-1027, 2007). Especially from these derived effect sizes should be interpreted carefully. © 2008 Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Möller, H. J. (2008, December). Isn’t the efficacy of antidepressants clinically relevant? A critical comment on the results of the metaanalysis by Kirsch et al. 2008. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-008-0836-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free