Prognostic Factors of Mid-to Long-term Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscal Tears

20Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) continues to be the popular treatment for meniscal tears, but recent randomized controlled trials have questioned its efficacy. To provide more evidence-based criteria for patient selection, we undertook this study to identify prognostic factors associated with clinical failure after APM for medial meniscus tears. Methods: Medical records of 160 patients followed up for at least 5 years after APM for medial meniscal tears were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data (age, sex, and body mass index), radiographic variables (Kellgren-Lawrence [K-L] grade and hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle), and clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity scale score, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were recorded. Clinical failure was defined as the need for an additional surgical procedure (arthroscopy, osteotomy, or arthroplasty) or the presence of intolerable pain. Survivorship analysis with clinical failure as an end point was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Factors related to clinical failure were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Cutoff values were determined using areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Radiographic progression of osteoarthritis was analyzed using the chi-square test, and serial changes of clinical scores were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results: Clinical success rates were 95.7% at 5 years, 75.6% at 10 years, and 46.3% at 15 years. Age, HKA angle, and K-L grade (p = 0.01, p = 0.02, and p = 0.04, respectively) were found to be significant risk factors of clinical failure. Cutoff values at 10 years postoperatively as determined by ROC analysis were 50 years for age (sensitivity = 0.778, 1-specificity = 0.589), grade 2 for K-L grade (sensitivity = 0.778, 1-specificity = 0.109), and 5.5° for HKA angle (sensitivity = 0.667, 1-specificity = 0.258). In patients who had clinical success until 10 years after APM, radiological osteoarthritis progressed gradually. However, the clinical scores of patients who achieved clinical success did not decrease significantly over the 10-year follow-up. Conclusions: The poor prognostic factors found to be related to clinical failure after APM for a medial meniscal tear were patient age (≥ 50 years), preoperative K-L grade (≥ grade 2), and preoperative HKA angle (≥ varus 5.5°).

References Powered by Scopus

The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: Osteoarthritis

1809Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knee joint changes after meniscectomy.

1557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee

885Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear is effective for root healing and cartilage regeneration in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: How Far Have We Come and What Remains?

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selective Extracellular Matrix Guided Mesenchymal Stem Cell Self-Aggregate Engineering for Replication of Meniscal Zonal Tissue Gradient in a Porcine Meniscectomy Model

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hong, S. Y., Han, W., Jang, J., Lee, J., Ro, D. H., Lee, M. C., & Han, H. S. (2022). Prognostic Factors of Mid-to Long-term Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscal Tears. CiOS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 14(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios20185

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

57%

Engineering 2

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free