comparative study of two surgical management methods for cervical incompetence at University College Hospital, Ibadan

  • Oladokun A
  • Adesina OA
  • Odukogbe AA
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BackgroundIncompetence of the internal uterine cervical os is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Different surgical techniques are in practice to correct the defect. Objective: The objective of this study therefore was to review the outcome of pregnancies following cervical using either of the two procedure among patients diagnosed as having incompetence of the cervix. MethodsA comparative study of 2 standard methods of cerclage used in our hospital, McDonald & Shirodkar, in a group of 80 patients was done. All the patients had cervical cerclage insertion done between the 14th & 16th weeks of gestation using either of the two methods. ResultsThere was no significant morbidity with either of the 2 methods. The overall success rates, as measured by continuation of the pregnancy to term, were smilar. ConclusionBoth methods of cervical cerclage are equally effective in producing the desired outcome, but since the McDonald method is technically simpler to perform, it may be desirable to adopt this approach more frequently.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oladokun A, Adesina OA, Odukogbe AA, Morhason-Bello IO, & Adewole IF. (2007). comparative study of two surgical management methods for cervical incompetence at University College Hospital, Ibadan. Ibom Medical Journal, 2(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.61386/imj.v2i1.16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free