A case study on improving the software dependability of a ros path planner for steep slope vineyards

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Software for robotic systems is becoming progressively more complex despite the existence of established software ecosystems like ROS, as the problems we delegate to robots become more and more challenging. Ensuring that the software works as intended is a crucial (but not trivial) task, although proper quality assurance processes are rarely seen in the open-source robotics community. This paper explains how we analyzed and improved a specialized path planner for steep-slope vineyards regarding its software dependability. The analysis revealed previously unknown bugs in the system, with a relatively low property specification effort. We argue that the benefits of similar quality assurance processes far outweigh the costs and should be more widespread in the robotics domain.

References Powered by Scopus

Path planning for ground robots in agriculture: A short review

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward Reliable Autonomous Robotic Assistants Through Formal Verification: A Case Study

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A framework for quality assessment of ROS repositories

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Towards autonomous mapping in agriculture: A review of supportive technologies for ground robotics

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

OHM: GPU Based Occupancy Map Generation

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

APPLICATION OF BIG DATA ANALYSIS IN PATH PLANNING OF INTELLIGENT PICKING ROBOT

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santos, L. C., Santos, A., Santos, F. N., & Valente, A. (2021). A case study on improving the software dependability of a ros path planner for steep slope vineyards. Robotics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10030103

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

44%

Computer Science 2

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

22%

Materials Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free