The value relevance of alternative performance measures: Evidence from the Oslo Stock Exchange

  • Stenheim T
  • Beckman A
  • Olsen Valltoft C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Companies disclose alternative performance measures (APMs), either to provide useful information to the market, or strategically in order to mislead the market. Using traditional price and return regressions, this study examines the value relevance of APMs and whether such measures are more value relevant than financial statement measures. The sample consists of the 100 largest companies listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange with quarterly data from 2012 to 2016. The authors find APMs to be value relevant for investors on the Oslo Stock Exchange. Furthermore, the authors conclude that APMs are more value relevant than financial statement measures. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution since the results are of limited statistical significance. Overall, the findings of this study suggest that companies disclose APMs to inform rather than mislead the market.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stenheim, T., Beckman, A. N., Olsen Valltoft, C., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2018). The value relevance of alternative performance measures: Evidence from the Oslo Stock Exchange. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 7(4), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v7_i4_p4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free