Responses of 36- to 63-day-old BUT Big 6 turkey toms to graded dietary methionine+cysteine levels

12Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A total of 734 male 36-day-old BUT Big 6 turkeys were allotted to 6 groups with 6 replicates each and were fed diets supplemented with graded methionine levels of 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.3, 1.8, or 2.4 g/kg, respectively. During four weeks of experimental feeding the weight gain of turkeys was proportional to the contents of methionine+cysteine in diets and consistent with the non-linear regression equation Y = 3279 + 363 × (1-d (-12.33 ×(X - 0.607))), r2 = 0.99. Nitrogen retention of the turkeys indicated a trend towards an increase in the amount of retained nitrogen with increasing methionine+cysteine level. The weight gain response suggested that optimum dietary methionine+cysteine levels are higher than 0.80 g/MJ ME, while feed conversion was not affected.

References Powered by Scopus

Digestible sulfur amino acid requirement for male turkeys from six to twelve weeks of age

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nutritional and immunomodulatory function of methionine in poultry diets - A review

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of DL-, L-isomers and DL-hydroxy analog administered at 2 levels as dietary sources of methionine on the metabolic and antioxidant parameters and growth performance of Turkeys

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of different dietary methionine levels on the growth performance and tissue redox parameters of turkeys

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lemme, A., Kozłowski, K., Jankowski, J., Petri, A., & Zduńczyk, Z. (2005). Responses of 36- to 63-day-old BUT Big 6 turkey toms to graded dietary methionine+cysteine levels. In Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 467–470). Polish Academy of Science. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/70708/2005

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

80%

Engineering 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0