Mesoscale convective vortices in multiscale, idealized simulations: Dependence on background state, interdependency with moist baroclinic cyclones, and comparison with BAMEX observations

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A set of multiscale, nested, idealized numerical simulations of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) and mesoscale convective vortices (MCVs) was conducted. The purpose of these simulations was to investigate the dependence of MCV development and evolution on background conditions and to explore the relationship between MCVs and larger, moist baroclinic cyclones. In all experiments, no mesoscale convective system (MCS) developed until a larger-scale, moist baroclinic system with surface pressure amplitude of at least 2 hPa was present. The convective system then enhanced the development of the moist baroclinic system by its diabatic production of eddy available potential energy (APE), which led to the enhanced baroclinic conversion of basic-state APE to eddy APE. The most rapid potential vorticity (PV) development occurred in and just behind the leading convective line. The entire system grew upscale with time as the newly created PV rotated cyclonically around a common center as the leading convective line continued to expand outward. Ten hours after the initiation of deep moist convection, the simulatedMCV radii, heights of maximum winds, tangential velocity, and shear corresponded reasonably well to their counterparts in BAMEX. The increasing strength of the simulated MCVs with respect to larger values of background CAPE and shear supports the hypothesis that as long as convection is present, CAPE and shear both add to the strength of the MCV. © 2010 American Meteorological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Conzemius, R. J., & Montgomery, M. T. (2010). Mesoscale convective vortices in multiscale, idealized simulations: Dependence on background state, interdependency with moist baroclinic cyclones, and comparison with BAMEX observations. Monthly Weather Review, 138(4), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2981.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free