Fraying at the Edges: A Subsystems/ Normative Power Analysis of the EU’s “One China Policy/Policies”

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The European Union’s position on “one China” has stood since the establishment of diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1975. As a union of distinct member states, the nature of the European Union’s (EU) foreign policymaking complicates efforts to maintain coherent common positions. Its effective “one China policy” (and those of its member states) is no exception. In recent years, the edges of the bloc’s long-standing policy have started to fray as the EU–PRC relationship has become more fraught and many member states have sought to deepen their effective, if “unofficial,” engagement with Taiwan. I explore these changes to the EU’s effective “one China policy” by employing a subsystems framework, starting from the position that the EU has foreign policies (rather than a singular policy) created through three subsystems. Through the Normative Power Europe lens, I explore the extent to which the actors pulling at these “threads” at the edges of the EU’s policy are motivated by normative concerns. I argue that the “fraying” of the EU’s “one China policy” is not the result of a conscious decision by the EU as a collective normative actor but stems from shifting preferences within the national and supranational subsystems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, S. A. W. (2022). Fraying at the Edges: A Subsystems/ Normative Power Analysis of the EU’s “One China Policy/Policies.” China Quarterly, 252, 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022001345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free