CG Versus MINRES: An Empirical Comparison

  • Chin-Lung Fong D
  • Saunders M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For iterative solution of symmetric systems  the conjugate gradient method (CG) is commonly used when A is positive definite, while the minimum residual method (MINRES) is typically reserved for indefinite systems. We investigate the sequence of approximate solutions  generated by each method and suggest that even if A is positive definite, MINRES may be preferable to CG if iterations are to be terminated early. In particular, we show for MINRES that the solution norms  are monotonically increasing when A is positive definite (as was already known for CG), and the solution errors  are monotonically decreasing. We also show that the backward errors for the MINRES iterates  are monotonically decreasing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chin-Lung Fong, D., & Saunders, M. (2012). CG Versus MINRES: An Empirical Comparison. Sultan Qaboos University Journal for Science [SQUJS], 16, 44. https://doi.org/10.24200/squjs.vol17iss1pp44-62

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free