A simplified clinical electrocardiogram score for the prediction of cardiovascular mortality

23Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) scores have been demonstrated to predict CV mortality but they are rarely utilized clinically. Objective: Develop a simple score consisting of adding classical ECG abnormalities to make the ECG a more convenient prognostic tool. Methods: Resting ECGs of 29,320 outpatient male veterans from the Palo Alto Veteran Affairs Healthcare System (PAVHS) collected between 1987 and 2000 were computer analyzed with an average follow-up of 7.5 y. Twelve classic ECG abnormalities were chosen on the basis of prevalence and corresponding relative risks, including left and right bundle branch block, diagnostic Q waves, intraventricular conduction defect, atrial fibrillation, left atrial abnormality, left and right axis deviation, left and right ventricular hypertrophy, ST depression, and abnormal QTc interval. A simple score derived from the summation of these criteria was then entered into an age and heart rate adjusted Cox analysis. Results: There was a progressive increase in risk of death as the number of ECG abnormalities increased. The relative risks for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 ECG abnormalities were 1.8 (CI 1.6-2.0), 2.4 (CI 2.2-2.7), 3.6 (CI 3.2-4.1), 4.5 (CI 3.8-5.4), and 6.0 (CI 4.7-7.8) respectively (p<0.001). The age-adjusted hazard ratio for CV mortality was 6.0 when there were five or more ECG abnormalities present. Conclusion: Summing the number of classical ECG abnormalities provides a powerful predictor of CV mortality independent of age, standard risk factors, and clinical status. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, S. Y., Sungar, G. W., Myers, J., Sandri, M., & Froelicher, V. (2009). A simplified clinical electrocardiogram score for the prediction of cardiovascular mortality. Clinical Cardiology, 32(2), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free