Psychometric properties of Health Literacy in Dentistry scale in an elderly Brazilian population

7Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD) scale in a sample of elderly Brazilian participants. HeLD was initially translated into and cross-culturally adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese language. The reliability and validity of HeLD were then assessed in a sample of 535 non-institutionalized older persons who also completed a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and health information. Data were then randomly separated into two sub-datasets, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed through structural equation modelling, with a maximum likelihood estimate to test the fit of the data to the factor structure of the long-and short-form HeLD (HeLD-29 and HeLD-14) versions of the instrument. The models were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion to assess goodness-of-fit and to determine which models were preferred. Internal consistency of HeLD was evaluated using Cronbachs coefficient α. Both versions of HeLD were observed to demonstrate high internal reliability (Cronbachs α ≥ 0.87 for all seven subscales), acceptable convergent (estimates of ≥ 0.50 for AVE and ≥ 0.70 for CR) and discriminant validity. However, the goodness-of-fit of the confirmatory factor analysis models demonstrated satisfactory results only for HeLD-14 subsamples (x2/df = 1.8-2.3; CFI = 0.97-0.98; GFI/NFI = 0.98-0.99; RMSEA = 0.05 a nd SRMR = 0.03). I n conclusion, HeLD-14 was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument to measure oral health literacy in elderly Brazilian participants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mialhe, F. L., Tenani, C. F., de Checchi, M. H. R., Jamieson, L., & Ju, X. (2020). Psychometric properties of Health Literacy in Dentistry scale in an elderly Brazilian population. Brazilian Oral Research, 34. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2020.VOL34.0021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free