Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: Lessons from an academic radiation oncology department

45Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of health conditions that come directly from patients. Use of PROs has been associated with improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and reduced end-of-life spending. Yet there are still outstanding questions regarding the process of implementing PRO collection in routine practice. In this article, we describe the experience of selecting and implementing PROs in a multisite, multidisease academic medical center-based radiation oncology practice and demonstrate that such largescale rollout is feasible. We establish that PROs can be implemented with minimal to no workflow delays, are generally seen as valuable by clinicians, and can enhance patient-doctor communication. We additionally detail the challenges involved in selecting clinically relevant PRO questionnaires and the centrality of physician buyin, easy data access, and clear workflows to successful implementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rotenstein, L. S., Agarwal, A., O’Neil, K., Kelly, A., Keaty, M., Whitehouse, C., … Martin, N. E. (2017). Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: Lessons from an academic radiation oncology department. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(5), 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free