Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding

256Citations
Citations of this article
311Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stance detection is the task of classifying the attitude Previous work has assumed that either the target is mentioned in the text or that training data for every target is given. This paper considers the more challenging version of this task, where targets are not always mentioned and no training data is available for the test targets. We experiment with conditional LSTM encoding, which builds a representation of the tweet that is dependent on the target, and demonstrate that it outperforms encoding the tweet and the target independently. Performance is improved further when the conditional model is augmented with bidirectional encoding. We evaluate our approach on the SemEval 2016 Task 6 Twitter Stance Detection corpus achieving performance second best only to a system trained on semi-automatically labelled tweets for the test target. When such weak supervision is added, our approach achieves state-of-the-art results.

References Powered by Scopus

Long Short-Term Memory

76928Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opinion mining and sentiment analysis

7099Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures

4541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Deep learning for sentiment analysis: A survey

1365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stance detection: A survey

269Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fake news stance detection using deep learning architecture (CNN-LSTM)

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Augenstein, I., Rocktäschel, T., Vlachos, A., & Bontcheva, K. (2016). Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding. In EMNLP 2016 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings (pp. 876–885). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d16-1084

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 128

76%

Researcher 22

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 153

81%

Engineering 13

7%

Social Sciences 12

6%

Linguistics 10

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0