Enhanced Sentiment Analysis Algorithms for Multi-Weight Polarity Selection on Twitter Dataset

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is based on the orientation of user attitudes and satisfaction towards services and subjects. Different methods and techniques have been introduced to analyze sentiments for obtaining high accuracy. The sentiment analysis accuracy depends mainly on supervised and unsupervised mechanisms. Supervised mechanisms are based on machine learning algorithms that achieve moderate or high accuracy but the manual annotation of data is considered a time-consuming process. In unsupervised mechanisms, a lexicon is constructed for storing polarity terms. The accuracy of analyzing data is considered moderate or low if the lexicon contains small terms. In addition, most research methodol-ogies analyze datasets using only 3-weight polarity that can mainly affect the performance of the analysis process. Applying both methods for obtaining high accuracy and efficiency with low user intervention during the analysis process is considered a challenging process. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of polarity weights and mechanisms for recent sentiment analysis research. A semi-supervised framework is applied for processing data using both lexicon and machine learning algorithms. An interactive sentiment analysis algorithm is proposed for distributing multi-weight polarities on Arabic lexicons that contain high morphological and linguistic terms. An enhanced scaling algorithm is embedded in the multi-weight algorithm to assign recommended weight polarities automati-cally. The experimental results are conducted on two datasets to measure the overall accuracy of proposed algorithms that achieved high results when compared to machine learning algorithms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mostafa, A. M. (2023). Enhanced Sentiment Analysis Algorithms for Multi-Weight Polarity Selection on Twitter Dataset. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 35(1), 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.028041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free