Release and decay kinetics of copeptin vs AVP in response to osmotic alterations in healthy volunteers

74Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: Copeptin is the C-Terminal fragment of the arginine vasopressin (AVP) prohormone whose measurement is more robust than that of AVP. Similar release and clearance characteristics have been suggested promoting copeptin as a surrogate marker. Objective: To characterize the physiology of osmotically regulated copeptin release and its half-life in direct comparison with plasma AVP. Design: Ninety-one healthy volunteers underwent a standardized three-phase test protocol including (1) osmotic stimulation into the hypertonic range by hypertonic-saline infusion followed by osmotic suppression via (2) oral water load and (3) subsequent glucose infusion. Plasma copeptin, AVP, serum sodium, and osmolality levels were measured in regular intervals. Results: In phase 1, an increase inmedian osmotic pressure [289 (286; 291) to 311 (309; 314)mOsm/kg H2O] caused similar release kinetics of plasma copeptin [4 (3.1; 6) to 29.3 (18.6; 48.2) pmol/L] and AVP [1 (0.7; 1.6) to 10.3 (6.8; 18.8) pg/mL]. Subsequent osmotic suppression to 298 (295; 301) mOsm/kg at the end of phase 3 revealedmarkedly different decay kinetics between both peptides-An estimated initial half-life of copeptin being approximately 2 times longer than that of AVP (26 vs 12 minutes). Conclusion: Copeptin is released in equimolar amounts with AVP in response to osmotic stimulation, suggesting its high potential as anAVPsurrogate for differentiation of osmotic disorders. Furthermore,we here describe the decay kinetics of copeptin in response to osmotic depression enabling to identify a halflife for copeptin in direct comparison with AVP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fenske, W. K., Schnyder, I., Koch, G., Walti, C., Pfister, M., Kopp, P., … Christ-Crain, M. (2018). Release and decay kinetics of copeptin vs AVP in response to osmotic alterations in healthy volunteers. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 103(2), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-01891

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free