Experience with vaginal birth versus cesarean childbirth: Integrative review of women's perceptions

9Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An integrative review was performed aimed at identifying the contribution of the research published in both national and international journals regarding women's perception of vaginal birth versus caesarean section. The search for the articles utilized MEDLINE, LILACS, BDENF, CINAHL and INDEXPSI databases spanning the years 2000 to 2009, and 17 studies were selected and analyzed. The studies present positive and negative perceptions of women regarding the two types of delivery, such as the role of women and easier recovery in vaginal birth, absence of pain in caesarean section and dissatisfaction with the medical care received, as well as recommendations for obstetric practice and suggestions for new investigations. The results indicate aspects of care that may contribute to women's satisfaction and the need for further research in order to better understand the multidimensionality of the delivery process, whether vaginal birth or cesarean section.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Velho, M. B., dos Santos, E. K. A., Brüggemann, O. M., & Camargo, B. V. (2012). Experience with vaginal birth versus cesarean childbirth: Integrative review of women’s perceptions. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 21(2), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000200026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free