Analgesic efficacy of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

16Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in cats. In a prospective, randomized and blinded clinical study, thirty cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy were sedated with intramuscular (IM) ketamine (5 mg/kg), midazolam (0.5 mg/kg), and tramadol (2 mg/ kg). Before the induction of anesthesia, the animals were randomly distributed into three groups of ten cats each: LA: Bilateral Stomach 36 (ST-36) and Spleen 6 (SP-6) acupoints were stimulated with an infrared laser; EA: Bilateral ST-36 and SP-6 acupoints were stimulated with an electrical stimulus; Control: No acupuncture was applied. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated in the first 24 hr post-extubation using the Interactive Visual Analogue Scale and UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale. Rescue analgesia was provided with IM tramadol (2 mg/ kg), and the pain scores were reassessed 30 min after the rescue intervention. If the analgesia remained insufficient, meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg IM, single dose) was administered. Data were analyzed using t-tests, the Mann-Whitney U test, and Friedman test. P<0.05 was considered significant. The pain scores did not significantly differ between the treatment groups at any time point (P>0.05). The prevalence of rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the Control group than in the LA and EA groups (P=0.033). Preoperative laser and electroacupuncture reduced the need for rescue analgesia during the first 24 hr after ovariohysterectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nascimento, F. F., Marques, V. I., Crociolli, G. C., Nicácio, G. M., Nicácio, I. P. A. G., & Cassu, R. N. (2019). Analgesic efficacy of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 81(5), 764–770. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.18-0744

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free