Comparison of Command-Based vs. Reality-Based Interaction in a Veterinary Medicine Training Application

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a study evaluating alternative interaction styles for a novel virtual reality simulator proposed for veterinary neurology training. We compared a reality-based interaction metaphor, which is commonly used in virtual reality applications, to a command-based metaphor that reduced interactivity toward improving overall application usability. A cohort of 55 veterinary medicine students took part in the study, which took place at the veterinary school building. The study used a crossover design that allowed each participant to try both systems. Results suggested some correctable usability issues with the reality-based system, particularly the inclusion of haptic feedback for certain parts of the examination. A strong overall preference for the reality-based system was also observed. The study highlighted the potential of using both systems in tandem, with the command-based system being used prior to the reality-based system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franzluebbers, A., Platt, S., & Johnsen, K. (2020). Comparison of Command-Based vs. Reality-Based Interaction in a Veterinary Medicine Training Application. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.608853

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free