Comparative Test of Ret-He Examination in Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency in Pregnant Women

  • Nugraha G
  • Masruroh N
  • Kurniasari D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The most common cause of anemia is iron deficiency, which found in 50% of anemia cases. There are 66.7% of pregnant women in Indonesia that still lack iron intake. Reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (Ret-He) examination as a single parameter is the initial indicator of iron deficiency, considered more sensitive in detecting iron reserves in the body. This study aims to determine the effectivity of the Ret-He examination as a single parameter in establishing the diagnosis of iron deficiency in pregnant women. This research was conducted on 30 pregnant women. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of Ret-He were determined by comparing the results of the biochemical examination of iron profiles. Iron deficiency defined as an abnormal examination result on two or more biochemical parameters, which were SI <50 µg/dL, TIBC >425 µg/dL, serum ferritin <10 ng/mL and Transferrin Saturation <15.0%. Between 30 pregnant women, there were 18 (60%) with iron deficiency and 12 (40%) without iron deficiency. Ret-He levels were significantly lower in pregnant women with iron deficiency (P=0.008). A decrease in the Ret-He level in iron deficiency positively correlated with serum Ferritin (r=0.433). The effectivity of the Ret-He examination had an AUC value of 0.785 (P=0.009). Ret-He diagnostic reliability had at a cut-off value of 27.2 pg with sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (50.0%), positive predictive value (38.9%), and negative predictive value (91.7%). Ret-He examination is a useful marker of iron deficiency in pregnant women so that it can be applied for screening or as a routine examination.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nugraha, G., Masruroh, N., & Kurniasari, D. W. (2020). Comparative Test of Ret-He Examination in Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency in Pregnant Women. Medical Laboratory Technology Journal, 6(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.31964/mltj.v0i0.303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free