When learning stumbles upon identity and affect: a loaded student–student collaboration in linear algebra

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In undergraduate mathematics education, students’ collaborations have gained a reputation as a ‘good’ learning practice. A more complex image emerges once collaborations are construed as an arena where cognitive, social, and affective matters intertwine in ways that can fuel and impede learning. In this study, I take a close look at a twenty-minute-long interaction between two first-year students who engaged in a sequence of routine problems about dot products presented in a computer-based learning-support system. The commognitive analysis of the interaction revealed an asymmetrical structure: one student led the mathematizing, while his partner followed and invested considerable efforts to avoid making a mathematical contribution. The leader’s attempts to switch positions and inquiry into the follower’s recurrent refusals to mathematize entailed loaded exchanges that took a toll on both students in terms of identity and affect. I compare these findings to previous studies with school students to discuss possible sources of ineffective communication in situations where students are expected to learn through collaborations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kontorovich, I. (2023). When learning stumbles upon identity and affect: a loaded student–student collaboration in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(8), 1526–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2173102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free