Association between Care Modality and Use with Treatment Response among Members Accessing Virtual Mental Health Services: Real-world Observational Study

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: There is a growing bottleneck in mental health care, as the demand for services has outpaced the availability of mental health professionals. Consequently, many health systems have shifted to teletherapy as a scalable approach to increasing accessibility to care. Within these care models, various treatment modalities (eg, coaching and clinical care) are used to deliver support for anxiety and depression. However, more research is needed to better understand the differences in treatment responses. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between different care modalities and the levels of use with symptom score changes for members seeking virtual care services. Methods: We conducted an observational study of 4219 members who accessed Ginger, an on-demand mental health service, between September 2020 and September 2021. Using a mobile app, members can access text-based behavioral health coaching and virtual clinical services. This study focused on members with clinically elevated depression or anxiety levels at baseline. Logistic regressions were used to assess the association between care modalities and the levels of use with treatment response in depression and anxiety, using the Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment, respectively. Results: Of the 4219 members, 1623 (38.47%) demonstrated a full response to depression, and 1684 (39.91%) demonstrated a full response to anxiety. Members who completed care (ie, text-based coaching, virtual clinical therapy, hybrid of coaching, and clinical care) beyond the introductory session showed significantly increased odds of a full response compared with those who completed only limited care. Members who completed a hybrid of care had the highest odds of improvement; the odds of showing a full response in depression were 2.31 times higher (95% CI 1.91-2.80; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shih, E., Aylward, B. S., Kunkle, S., & Graziani, G. (2022). Association between Care Modality and Use with Treatment Response among Members Accessing Virtual Mental Health Services: Real-world Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.2196/36956

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free