Are revised models better models? A skill score assessment of regional interannual variability

18Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Various skill scores are used to assess the performance of revised models relative to their original configurations. The interannual variability of all-India, Sahel and Nordeste rainfall and summer monsoon windshear is examined in integrations performed under the experimental design of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. For the indices considered, the revised models exhibit greater fidelity at simulating the observed interannual variability. Interannual variability of all-India rainfall is better simulated by models that have a more realistic rainfall climatology in the vicinity of India, indicating the beneficial effect of reducing systematic model error. Copyright 1999 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sperber, K. R. (1999). Are revised models better models? A skill score assessment of regional interannual variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(9), 1267–1270. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free