Objectifying subjective probabilities: Dutch book arguments for principles of direct inference

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A Principle of Direct Inference licenses an inference from the frequency of the occurrence of attributes in a population to the probability of particular occurrence of 8 an attribute in a sample. From a Bayesian point of view, such a Principle requires 9 that if we have knowledge of the relative frequency of an attribute in a population, our degree of belief in the occurrence of that attribute in the population be 11 equal to this frequency (or that this knowledge should somehow constrain our de- 12 grees of belief about the occurrence in a sample).1 This might seem so painfully 13 self-evident as to not need any justification. However, Bayesian justifications for 14 constraining degrees of belief are usually based on Dutch Book arguments, and in- 15 deed several such arguments for Principles of Direct inference have been offered. 16 I will discuss three, and find them wanting. Subjective probabilities therefore re- 17 main subjective even when conditioned on knowledge of objective probabilities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Childers, T. (2012). Objectifying subjective probabilities: Dutch book arguments for principles of direct inference. In Probabilities, Laws, and Structures (pp. 19–28). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free