Probing the environmental impacts of structural transition and demographic mobility in Africa: Does technological innovation matter?

13Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although available statistics reveal Africa as an insignificant contributor to the devastating global climate condition, the succeeding impacts seem to hit the region harder than others. Efforts to address the environmental issues have seen the transition from carbon-intensive to carbon-abating sectors. Hence, this study makes the first empirical attempt to probe the ecological effects of structural transition and demographic mobility amidst the presence of technological innovation, foreign direct investment, and renewable energy. The empirical evidence focuses on the five highest emitters in Africa from 1990 to 2019 using advanced estimators, including cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL), augmented mean group (AMG), common correlated effect mean group (CCEMG), and method of moment quantile regression (MMQR). For easy tracking of emanating effects, structural transition is captured by agriculture, manufacturing, and service sectors’ value added, whereas demographic mobility vectors rural and urban population. The results reveal agriculture sector, manufacturing sector, rural population, and urban population as amplifiers of CO2 emissions. Conversely, the moderating roles of technological innovation amidst service sector, foreign direct investment, and renewable energy are confirmed. Besides, Granger causality uncovers unidirectional and bidirectional causality in the model. Promoting developments in research and development and adopting carbon tax policies are among the emanating policies on the findings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zou, X., Yang, S., Ibrahim, R. L., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Probing the environmental impacts of structural transition and demographic mobility in Africa: Does technological innovation matter? Energy and Environment, 35(5), 2699–2725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231153967

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free