When imitation doesn't flatter: The role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry

94Citations
Citations of this article
276Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a series of four experiments, the authors examine the implications of one consumer's possession being mimicked by another consumer. The results demonstrate that when distinctiveness concerns are heightened, greater dissociation responses (i.e., possession disposal intentions, recustomization behaviors, and exchange behaviors) arise in response to being mimicked by a similar as opposed to dissimilar other. These effects are driven by threats to distinctiveness. Finally, these effects are mitigated when the imitated possession is nonsymbolic in nature and when a low degree of effort is exerted to initially obtain the possession. Implications for marketers and consumers are discussed. © 2011 by Journal of Consumer Research, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2011). When imitation doesn’t flatter: The role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1086/660187

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free