From Robodebt to responsible AI: sociotechnical imaginaries of AI in Australia

0Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines Australia’s recent AI governance efforts through the lens of sociotechnical imaginaries. Using the example of Robodebt, it demonstrates how a more holistic and contextual examination of AI governance can help shed light on the social impacts and responsibilities associated with AI technologies. It argues that, despite the recent discursive shift to ‘safe and responsible AI’, a sociotechnical imaginary of AI as ‘economic good’ has been a persistent undercurrent in the past two governments’ efforts at AI governance. Understanding how such sociotechnical imaginaries are embedded in AI governance can help us better predict how these governance efforts will impact society.

References Powered by Scopus

Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea

1224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings

300Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics

193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kao, K. T. (2024). From Robodebt to responsible AI: sociotechnical imaginaries of AI in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 10(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2346420

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 4

57%

Computer Science 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free