Examining the Social Organization Practices of Cybercriminals in the Netherlands Online and Offline

21Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study focuses on the organization practices of networks of cybercriminals engaged in serious financial offenses, through a qualitative analysis of the Best and Luckenbill’s sociological framework. The study utilized data collected regarding 18 separate criminals investigations from the Netherlands. The results demonstrate that the participants within these networks operated at various stages of deviant sophistication. Surprisingly, the majority of networks exhibit organizational sophistication based on their division of labor and extended duration over time. In fact, most of this sample could be classified as “teams” or “formal organizations.” Furthermore, in contrast with prior studies, no loners were present and only a few networks could be classified as “colleagues” or “peers”.

References Powered by Scopus

Cybercrime and society

332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of internet miscreants

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An analysis of underground forums

248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Threats from the Dark: A Review over Dark Web Investigation Research for Cyber Threat Intelligence

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cybercrime on the menu? Examining cafeteria-style offending among financially motivated cybercriminals

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding the state of criminological scholarship on cybercrimes

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leukfeldt, E. R., & Holt, T. J. (2020). Examining the Social Organization Practices of Cybercriminals in the Netherlands Online and Offline. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19895886

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

38%

Computer Science 2

25%

Social Sciences 2

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free