Background Previous studies have shown that accurate process of care predicts quality of care. Few examples currently exist for process of care for the acute surgical patient. A recent region wide audit had identifi ed good outcomes for patients with acute pancreatitis at our institution but aspects of care that could be improved. Methods For this re-audit, a simple written care pathway for the management of those presenting with acute pancreatitis was introduced in our institution from February to July 2009. The audit standards were set against the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for management of acute pancreatitis and were compared with the previous region wide audit. Results Marked improvements were noted in the rates of abdominal imaging achieved within 24 h of diagnosis (35.2% vs 47.7%), severity stratifi cation within 48 h of diagnosis (28.7% vs 75%), critical care admission for those classifi ed as severe (39.3% vs 63.6%) and defi native treatment during index admission (22.2% vs 38.5%). Survival rates were 100% for this audit cycle and 95% for all patients within the region wide audit. Despite these improvements, care still does not reach the standards set out by BSG. Conclusion Predefi ned processes of care may help to recognise those developing or likely to develop severe pancreatitis, ensure accurate documentation of severity, expedite critical care review and/or admission, and help to encourage the timely management of those with a treatable underlying cause of their pancreatitis.
CITATION STYLE
McCallum, I. J. D., Hicks, G. J., Attwood, S., & Seymour, K. (2011). Impact of a care pathway in acute pancreatitis. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 87(1027), 379–381. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.002113rep
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.