Assessing the precision in loading estimates by geodetic techniques in Southern Europe

20Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper investigates the precision of the estimation of geophysical fluid load deformation computed from GRACE space gravity, GPS vertical displacement and geophysical fluids models [Global Circulation Models (GCMs) for ocean, atmosphere and hydrology], using the three-cornered hat method. This method allows the estimation of the variance of the errors of each technique, when the same quantity is monitored by three instruments with independent errors. Applied on a network of stations, several points of viewcan be considered: the technique level (in order to determine the error of each technique: GRACE, GPS and GCMs), the solution level (allowing to compare the precision of the same techniquewhen different strategies/models are used), and the station level (in order to emphasize local anomalies and geographical patterns). In particular, our results show a precision of the loading vertical displacement at the level of 1 mm when using GRACE or the fluid models, and of 2 mm using GPS. We do not find significant differences between the precision of different solutions of the same techniques, even when there are strong differences in the data processing. © The Authors 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valty, P., De Viron, O., Panet, I., Van Camp, M., & Legrand, J. (2013). Assessing the precision in loading estimates by geodetic techniques in Southern Europe. Geophysical Journal International, 194(3), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free