Efficacy and safety of maraviroc versus efavirenz, both with zidovudine/lamivudine: 96-week results from the MERIT study

66Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The MERIT study evaluated maraviroc versus efavirenz, both with zidovudine/lamivudine, in treatment-naïve patients with CCR5-tropic (R5) HIV-1. Post hoc analyses previously assessed week 48 outcomes in patients rescreened with R5 virus by a more sensitive tropism assay. Methods: Week 96 efficacy (post hoc, n = 614) and safety (n = 721) were assessed. Results: Proportions of subjects <50 copies/mL (58.8% maraviroc, 62.7% efavirenz) and time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) responders (<50 copies/mL: 60.5% vs 60.7%) were similar. Maraviroc recipients had greater CD4 increases (+ 212 vs + 171 cells/mm3) and fewer adverse event discontinuations (6.1% vs 15.5%), malignancies, and category C events. Conclusion: Week 96 data confirm week 48 observations in MERIT. © 2010 Thomas Land Publishers, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sierra-Madero, J., Di Perri, G., Wood, R., Saag, M., Frank, I., Craig, C., … Mayer, H. (2010). Efficacy and safety of maraviroc versus efavirenz, both with zidovudine/lamivudine: 96-week results from the MERIT study. HIV Clinical Trials, 11(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1310/hct1103-125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free