A randomised comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation for infraclavicular catheter placement

9Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We conducted this study to determine if placement of infraclavicular catheters guided by ultrasound is quicker than placement guided by nerve stimulation. Infraclavicular brachial plexus catheters were inserted in 210 randomly allocated patients who were scheduled for elective hand or elbow surgery. Needle and catheter placement was guided by ultrasound (n = 105) or by nerve stimulation (n = 105). The primary outcome was time to sensory block success. Success rate was similar between the two techniques (83.2% vs 81.4%, p = 0.738). However, placement of ultrasound-guided catheters took less time (7.2 [2.5] vs 9.6 [3.6] min, p < 0.001). Pain and satisfaction scores, and incidence of nerve deficit, were also similar with both techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dhir, S., Armstrong, K., Armstrong, P., Bouzari, A., Mall, J., Yu, J., … King, G. (2016). A randomised comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation for infraclavicular catheter placement. Anaesthesia, 71(2), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free