Democratic institutions and variability of economic growth in Pakistan: Some evidence from the time-series analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper explores the empirical association between democracy and per capita output growth in Pakistan using data for the period 1947 to 2006. The findings of the paper indicate a weak negative association between democracy and output growth. Consistent with some current empirical literature, democracy is also found to influence output growth indirectly. The empirical results are robust to different democracy variables and output growth equation specifications. The empirical findings also highlight the role of other variables in determining output growth and, except for rising oil prices, show its positive linkage to physical and human capital, government consumption, openness of trade practices and inflation. © The Pakistan Development Review.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Some tests of specification for panel data:monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations

19048Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models

11812Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A contribution to the empirics of economic growth

7417Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Does democracy cause growth? A meta-analysis (of 2000 regressions)

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consequences of political instability, governance and bureaucratic corruption on inflation and growth: The case of pakistan

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zakaria, M., & Fida, B. A. (2009). Democratic institutions and variability of economic growth in Pakistan: Some evidence from the time-series analysis. Pakistan Development Review. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.30541/v48i3pp.269-289

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Philosophy 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free