Special article: Redressing the balance - the ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomised clinical trial: Point of view

37Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Summary: A double standard exists whereby a treatment given outside a clinical trial is less stringently reviewed than a protocol treatment. We propose a remedy which would require the decision not to participate in an approved, available clinical trial to be subject to the same ethical requirements as trial entry. © 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Segelov, E., Tattersall, M. H. N., & Coates, A. S. (1992). Special article: Redressing the balance - the ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomised clinical trial: Point of view. Annals of Oncology, 3(2), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free