Summary: A double standard exists whereby a treatment given outside a clinical trial is less stringently reviewed than a protocol treatment. We propose a remedy which would require the decision not to participate in an approved, available clinical trial to be subject to the same ethical requirements as trial entry. © 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
CITATION STYLE
Segelov, E., Tattersall, M. H. N., & Coates, A. S. (1992). Special article: Redressing the balance - the ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomised clinical trial: Point of view. Annals of Oncology, 3(2), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058119
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.