Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques

5Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the fixation of the central venous catheter (CVC) using two suture techniques. Methods: A clinical, analytical, interventional, longitudinal, prospective, controlled, singleblind and randomized study in adult, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. After admission and indication of CVC use, the patients were allocated to the Wing group (n = 35, catheter fixation with clamping wings and retainers) or Shoelace group (n = 35, catheter fixation using shoelace cross-tied sutures around the device). Displacement, kinking, fixation failure, hyperemia at the insertion site, purulent secretion, loss of the device, psychomotor agitation, mental confusion, and bacterial growth at the insertion site were evaluated. Results: Compared with the Wing group, the Shoelace group had a lower occurrence of catheter displacement (n=0 versus n =4; p = 0.04), kinking (n=0 versus n=8; p=0.001), and fixation failure (n=2 versus n=8; p=0.018). No significant difference was found in bacterial growth (n=20 versus n=14; p=0.267) between groups. Conclusion: The Shoelace fixation technique presented fewer adverse events than the Wing fixation technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leal, M. L. M., Loyola, A. B. A. T., Hueb, A. C., Neto, J. D. D. S., Filho, M. M., De Paiva, L. F., … Ferreira, L. M. (2017). Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 32(8), 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170080000010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free