The ghost is the machine: Media-philosophy and materialism

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In A Midsummer Night’s Dream Shakespeare asks us to think about how the ‘imagination bodies forth/The forms of things unknown’ (V. i. 14-15). This line, in a play replete with fairies, asks us to consider the work of the imagination. How are we to imagine the imagination itself? Certainly, the way in which Shakespeare imagined his Oberon - King of the fairies, or his Titania - Queen of the fairies, or Puck, Peasebottom, Cobweb, Moth or Mustardseed, first took material shape on a page, on paper, penned, we presume, in ink. As the play says, ‘the poet’s pen/Turns them [the forms of things unknown] to shapes, and gives to airy nothing/A local habitation and a name’ (V. i. 15-17). With the help of a writing instrument, ‘airy nothing’ is turned into something. What was invisible becomes visible. What was immaterial becomes material. But is the pen just that: an instrument, a tool? Are the instruments we use to make art from the ‘airy nothing’ in our heads just that: tools which serve art?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Littau, K. (2011). The ghost is the machine: Media-philosophy and materialism. In New Takes in Film-Philosophy (pp. 154–170). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free